Posted by: Christian | May 5, 2008

Cartographic Paranoia

I was reading a blog entry over at Kotare (The Strategist) about the redrawing of borders, and about Jeffrey Goldberg’s hypothetical map of the new middle east (also discussed at Coming Anarchy):

goldberg map

Of course, this reminded me of Ralph Peter’s infamous map:

ralph peters map

Ralph Peters, a retired US Army Lt.Col. and author, had written an article in Armed Forces Journal that included the above map. The article was met with the usual amount of skepticism and criticism that any proposed border redrawing proposal receives (including in the same journal). But the hypothetical redrawing was in the independent-private Armed Forces Journal and was written by a retired officer who is out of the loop. So what?

Well, the result was some serious paranoia on the part of some people in the middle east. Certain parties were sure that this was a signal of White House intentions and the borders were fiercely debated. I would say these people are taking things a little too seriously, but then again the establishment of the state of Israel and the war in Iraq were signaled well ahead of time as well. Of course, I consider this the musings of a bored old soldier. But the map was not redrawing any borders where I live.

Closer to my area of focus, there are private proposals for new borders that affect Afghanistan. To start with, here is a map of Pashtunistan:

pashtunistan

Pashtunistan? Some people are very serious about Pashtunistan, including some people very close to Karzai. Notice how Afghanistan has consistently refused to recognize the Durand Line? The dream lives on.

The flag of Pashtunistan:

Some like to reminisce about the good old days of the Durrani Empire:

But realistically, they’ll settle for Pashtunistan plus the non-Pashtun areas of Afghanistan all rolled up into one state. Of course, this would require just a wee bit of extra effort. Might the government of Pakistan resist? Of course. Would the Baluchis and Dardic-speaking people up north be happy about being included in a Greater Afghanistan? Probably not. And how about Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazaras, Turkmen, etc…? The new state would completely marginalize them demographically.

This is all speculation of course. But are some people in Afghanistan and Pakistan waiting, watching and hoping? Absolutely. And some of them are in Karzai’s inner circle. Stranger cartographic events have occurred.

Responses

I’ve always loved how Americans enjoy casually discussing the prospects of carving ethno-nationalist states out of Brown-Skin countries, but when the idea of something like the Chicano Aztlan movement rears its head in Southern California, Americans flip over backward in fear and anger. We can’t carve up AMERICA! It’s ancient!

Also, I would love to see those ambitious Pashtuns try to place Balochistan in their brand new Pashtunistan (a concessions westerners seem to indulge but they don’t, perhaps because a reduced Pashtunistan is far less impressive-looking). More specifically, I’d love to see what the Marri and Mengal tribes have to say about it, and if we’d get to see another Prince Abdul Karim Khan-type figure.

[...] be part of Pakistan or maintain independence. This was partly backed by early Indian advocacy of “Pashtunistan” in the mid ‘40s, and the issue continued well into Afghanistan’s official opposition to [...]

Somebody left out Delhi… Afghanistan’s southern borders seem to linger up and down the plains of Pakistan.

[...] Cartographic Paranoia, Ghosts of Alexander - great post about the psychological implications of redrawing boundaries in the Middle East and Afghanistan. [...]

what makes the first map so amateur is that there is no Afghanistan on the map at all. That makes all that theory so weak and unrealistic. I mean Afghanistan have a brave and proud history, it cant just disapear. And noice that Afghan means Pashtun, wich make both afghanistan and pashtunistan (NWFP and large part of Baluchistan) land of Afghans(Pashtuns)

The Thing with this Map is that firstly its Scary, :P

not just for the Muslims but for the Americans , since Israel specially the American Born Jews and the Zionists who Support Israel wont be happy with pre 1967 borders

secondly this will create a great sense of unity amongst the Muslim Nations… seeing their countries being cut out into pieces this will have a huge fall back for the European union, as well as USA,

its not that its not going to happen it can happen but what comes is what is scary is that they people who calculate this fail to realize that all the countries involved are muslim countries,

and the concept of PAN Islamic thought has been really pumped due to American actions in the middle east, and any further action will be a cause of moving the people to accept the extremist’s view of american Agenda ….. that could be a serious problem for USA.

and might eventually lead to war with Isreal, or something like an Armegadon.. with 1.3 + billion Muslims on one side and the rest of the world army on one side… since the muslims have been waiting for the … Great Catastrophy… and then Coming of the Mahdi Who will lead them into a War with the Roman Empire

well thats just my thought

I wonder if Pakhtonistan will be secular?

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories